![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I've been noticing in some wishlists some pairings that are not rare, things such as Draco/Hermione. I'm not really sure how this is happening since we are called Rare Pair Shorts. I didn't think I needed to stress that your wishlists must consist of RARE PAIRS ONLY.
If your wishlist contains a non-rare pairing, I will tell you, and you will need to edit your wishlist accordingly.
However, all this did get me thinking. We have a list of things we consider non-rare and therefore not acceptable at this community, and over time we've been getting some questions about a few pairings. We the mods are starting to get iffy about a few of them ourselves, so we figured it might be best to put it to vote.
If you consider any of the following pairings RARE, mark YES. If you think they are NOT RARE, mark NO.
If there are any pairings you feel need to be ADDED to our list, write those in the text entry box. [ETA: THAT MEANS DON'T PUT DOWN PAIRINGS THAT ARE ALREADY ON OUR LIST.] If there are any pairings you feel need to be REMOVED from our list and have not been discussed in this post, please LEAVE A COMMENT.
Thanks for your help! :)
[Poll #1415120]
ETA: The poll has been fixed. ;)
If your wishlist contains a non-rare pairing, I will tell you, and you will need to edit your wishlist accordingly.
However, all this did get me thinking. We have a list of things we consider non-rare and therefore not acceptable at this community, and over time we've been getting some questions about a few pairings. We the mods are starting to get iffy about a few of them ourselves, so we figured it might be best to put it to vote.
If you consider any of the following pairings RARE, mark YES. If you think they are NOT RARE, mark NO.
If there are any pairings you feel need to be ADDED to our list, write those in the text entry box. [ETA: THAT MEANS DON'T PUT DOWN PAIRINGS THAT ARE ALREADY ON OUR LIST.] If there are any pairings you feel need to be REMOVED from our list and have not been discussed in this post, please LEAVE A COMMENT.
Thanks for your help! :)
[Poll #1415120]
ETA: The poll has been fixed. ;)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 02:48 am (UTC)But I do think all femmeslash pairings are rare, simply because femmeslash in this fandom is rare.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 03:00 am (UTC)So I think, for example, things like Hermione/Luna are big enough to not called rare. Hermione/Ginny as well.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 03:04 am (UTC)That's true. I didn't think of it that way. :)
Aww, love your icon! ♥
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 04:57 am (UTC)Neville/Ginny - 12. However, fully half of those were either written by me or written for me, either as a response to a drabble/ficlet prompt or as a giftfic in an exchange. Take those away, and there are six N/G fics in six months.
Neville/Luna - 11, none of which were written by me. Several were written by one author, though.
Compare that to Neville/Draco, which is commonly considered a rarepair. In the past six months, there have been 30 fics/ficlets/drabbles written featuring that pairing.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:12 am (UTC)You have to base it on femmeslash alone because femmeslash isn't very popular in comparison to het or slash, and all of femmeslash can NOT be rare.
So based off the demographics of the femmeslash community alone, Hermione/Ginny is definitely not a rare pair.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:17 am (UTC)Upon reading some of the comments and looking at the polls, I think I've got another issue here. What exactly is our definition for rare?
I have to admit, mine is pretty strict. Rare for me is...well, rare. If it's got a LJ community and at least five or so pages at ff.net, then I say it isn't rare. If it has got a fan base of more than ten or so people, not rare.
Is there some sort of community accepted standard for rare?
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:22 am (UTC)Plus, okay, think of it this way, it isn't exactly what is popular, right? It is what is common seeing as common is the opposite of rare.
So what are the common femmeslash pairings? Well, Hermione/Ginny and Ginny/Luna are common. They are what most people would list/write if femmeslash was brought up.
And that's not what this community is for. It is so people can write things that aren't common, that aren't the first thing people think of when you say femmeslash/slash/het.
Luna/Pansy would be a rare femmeslash paring as far as I know. Bellatrix/Lily, Molly/Hermione, Umbridge/Minerva, etc.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:25 am (UTC)619? That's almost 15 times more fic than Harry/Luna. Why would you consider this possibly rare?
As for Draco/Ginny, there are several active comms for it and it has a couple of websites hosting hundreds of fics dedicated specifically to D/G. I call "not rare."
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:28 am (UTC)But then again, as I've said, I've got a strict definition of what is rare and what isn't so...
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:38 am (UTC)Femmeslash isn't as popular as het and slash, and that's what I am saying here. You can't lump it in with both of them because of that. Obviously no femmeslash pairing is going to be as big as Draco/Harry or James/Lily. It just isn't possible.
However, there are plenty of femmeslash pairings that are common within the femmeslash community.
That's what I've been saying all along.
You clearly have your opinions, I have mine and you obviously aren't interested in hearing any dissent.
And, I'm sorry, but pot meet kettle. :-/ I don't appreciate being called rude only to get this impolite phrase thrown into my face, okay? If you don't want to debate something with someone, don't start up a debate. D: I'm just responding to your claims that my claims are wrong. There's nothing rude or pig-headed about that.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:40 am (UTC)I would agree with you if we were talking about a smaller fandom. But HP is huge. We need to look at the fics in terms of % of total fics in the category. 5+ pages on ffnet for a smaller fandom (let's say...15% of fics) = definitely not rare. But when we're talking about tens of thousands of writers and hundreds of thousands of fics, 5+ pages starts looking like nothing (only 0.0003% of fics).
We can't look at absolute number of shippers/fics or there'd be next to nothing that's rare in HP. You're probably going to be able to find 10 people who'll ship anything in HP. A recent Remus/Fat Lady fic I read had more than 10 comments on it. I'm sure in all of fandom, there are at least 10 people who would support it, as ridiculous as it is.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:40 am (UTC)Lots of pairings have LJ comms, and some of those pairings are rare. I know there's one for Sirius/Pansy, and another for Neville/James II, and I think we can both agree those are super rare. I think comm activity is a better way of rating rareness, rather than comm existence. The Neville/Ginny comm hasn't had a post in months, while the Neville/Hannah comm is much more active in comparison.
I think pairing popularity rises and falls, too. Pre-DH, Neville/Hannah was definitely a rarepair. Since JKR's interviews though, there's been a small surge of N/H fic, and it's not nearly as rare as it used to be. Conversely, pre-DH there was a lot more Neville/Luna fic posted than what's found now.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:41 am (UTC)What I mean by "overall presence" is the number of existing fics for the pairing, whether it be on LJ or FF.net or wherever. Since a numerical limit would be difficult to keep track of, I guess the task at hand is to come up with a way to categorize all the middle-of-the-road ships as rare and not rare.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:44 am (UTC)I'm obviously not being clear enough though. Heh.
Okay, you've got your super pairings right? And by that I mean Draco/Harry, Snape/Harry, Ron/Hermione, Harry/Hermione, Remus/Sirius, etc. Okay, those we automatically take out. And we probably lose over half of our accumulated fic right?
Okay, then we divide into groups: slash, het, femmeslash, and look at them individually.
Based on that anything that has 5+ pages and a big enough fanbase to have a community isn't rare. And I'm not tlaking about people who 'like' the pairing. I'm talking people who write/comment/join communities based off the pairing.
Does that make a little more sense?
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:48 am (UTC)That way, unless we have someone who desperately needs to write something middle-of-the-road, we don't have a whole community full of middle-of-the-road?
Because, quite frankly, if all the middle-of-the-road pairings are allowed in, I think who sort of lose the "rare pair" community. And that would be very, very sad.
(And yes, I have quite an opinion on this because I'm really into this community for RARE. I mean...look at the ships I've written. >.<)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:50 am (UTC)I'm inclined to say no, because it's hard to measure exactly how a ship's popularity is decreasing. Also, just because a ship's popularity is decreasing doesn't mean fanfiction for that ship is hard to come by.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:53 am (UTC)As to my turn of phrase, it was not meant to be rude, as I have stated. And, again, I'm sorry you took it that way. There's nothing I can do about it now.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:54 am (UTC)Let's say hypothetically that Harry/Luna is 3% of all het fics. That makes it rare. But if you excise all popular pairings, then it would probably be 10-15% of what's left. That makes it not rare. So, which is it? I would still call it a rarepair, because its presence in fandom is substantially lower than other pairings as a whole.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-13 05:56 am (UTC)